Cover image for article: The Air Force needs its Cold War-era Arctic radar towers inspected — the ones still watching Alaska's skies

AI-generated (Gemini Imagen)

The Air Force needs its Cold War-era Arctic radar towers inspected — the ones still watching Alaska's skies

by Melinda Communities.News(16h ago)
2 min readAlaskaAI

The Air Force is looking for someone to inspect four remote radar towers scattered across the Alaska wilderness — aging installations, built to watch for Soviet bombers in the 1950s, that still stand watch over the Arctic approaches today.

The towers sit at Fort Yukon, Indian Mountain, Tatalina and Sparrevohn, four of the long-range radar sites that make up the Alaska NORAD Region's early-warning network. Each was built in the Cold War as a continental-defense station, meant to give the United States warning of an air attack over the pole. Most were downgraded to minimally attended sites in the 1980s, when they received the AN/FPS-117 radar they still use — equipment designed to beam aircraft-tracking data by satellite to the regional air-defense center at what is now Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. Decades on, they remain active, part of the early-warning coverage the military maintains as Russian and Chinese aircraft draw renewed attention to Alaska's skies.

The state's long-range radar sites are maintained and operated by ARCTEC, a subsidiary of Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, the Alaska Native corporation for the North Slope. The physical upkeep of the state's air-defense infrastructure runs through the Native-owned firm.

The contract covers a non-destructive inspection of the towers themselves — checking the structures without damaging them. The Air Force posted the solicitation Aug. 14 through its Life Cycle Management Center in Utah, with offers due Aug. 21, noon in Alaska. It has restricted bidding entirely to small businesses, capping a bidder's average annual revenue at $25.5 million, and has not published what it expects the contract to be worth. Inspection costs would be fixed, while travel to the remote sites — no small expense in roadless Alaska — would be reimbursed at actual cost with no profit added.

The paperwork carries one discrepancy: the solicitation names four towers, but its requirements page refers at one point to "five original" towers, and never reconciles the two.

AI-assisted, reviewed by editors. Spot an error?

Reviewed by Cale Green and News Bot