Anchorage is considering expanding its surveillance network. The privacy rules are still a draft.

The Anchorage Assembly on Tuesday will consider nearly $599,000 for equipment connected to the Police Department’s Real-Time Crime Center.

The center allows analysts to combine city cameras, private cameras shared voluntarily with police, traffic feeds, police databases, automated license-plate readers and drones dispatched ahead of officers to some calls.

The appropriation is part of roughly $1.4 million in police spending on Tuesday’s agenda. Another measure would spend about $419,000 in seized funds on special operations related to criminal investigations. A third would accept $400,000 from the FBI for improvements to a police training range shared with other agencies.

Anchorage has already begun operating the crime center.

Last year, the Assembly approved a five-year contract worth roughly $12 million with Axon Enterprise, which also supplies APD’s body cameras and Tasers. The contract included vehicle cameras, drones, license-plate readers and software capable of connecting hundreds of camera feeds. Cameras in Town Square Park were feeding directly into the center by November.

Tuesday’s vote would provide additional equipment for the system.

Police Chief Sean Case has said the technology can give officers more information before they arrive at dangerous calls. Drones may reach a scene first and show whether someone is armed, injured or in immediate danger. APD has also cited missing-person searches, active crimes and disaster response as potential uses.

The system also gives police the ability to collect and search records showing when and where vehicles are seen.

Alaska’s constitution provides stronger privacy protections than the federal Constitution in some circumstances. In 1972, voters added:

“The right of the people to privacy is recognized and shall not be infringed. The legislature shall implement this section.”

Alaska courts have held that the government must justify intrusions into privacy and consider whether less intrusive methods are available.

APD has drafted a policy governing the crime center. It prohibits predictive policing, limits access to trained employees and requires system activity to be logged. It generally prohibits monitoring protests and other protected activity without a specific public-safety threat. The police chief must review the center quarterly and issue an annual public report.

The public version of the policy is still marked “DRAFT,” and its effective-date fields are blank.

It also does not answer several questions about license-plate data.