North Pacific council directs Ecosystem Committee to revise 2004 groundfish policy goals

Alaska's groundfish management policy goals are heading for their first significant language update in more than two decades, with tribal representatives pressing the council to ensure that subsistence communities and Western Alaska salmon interests are not left behind in a narrow revision.

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council voted Tuesday to close its triennial policy review and sent the Ecosystem Committee back to work on specific language changes before any formal fishery management plan amendment begins. The motion, made by council member Kimball and seconded by Pamplin, passed without objection. It found that the review document was complete and that the council's work during the three-year review period generally aligns with the current management policy.

The review centers on goals written in 2004 that provide high-level guidance for the council's groundfish work, including bycatch limits, habitat protections, and engagement with communities affected by groundfish fisheries. Two goals drew the most scrutiny. Goal 3, on preserving the food web, needs updating to address marine ecosystems and climate resilience. Goal 8, on Alaska Native consultation, carries a terminology problem the Ecosystem Committee flagged: the word "consultation" now has a specific legal meaning referring to government-to-government talks between NOAA and federally recognized tribes, which is not how the council used it in 2004. "The group felt that the term engagement or something similar would be more appropriate here," the Ecosystem Committee report stated.

The Advisory Panel unanimously supported the Ecosystem Committee recommendations. Any actual modifications to the goals and objectives would require a fishery management plan amendment, which the council chose not to initiate at this time.

Tribal representatives from two river commissions testified that the changes don't go far enough. The policy director of the Yukon River Intertribal Fish Commission told the council it should treat Yukon River salmon as ecosystem indicators, not bycatch footnotes. "The ongoing collapse of these stocks suggests that the Council should treat Yukon River salmon not as simply as incidentally bycatch concerns, but as ecosystem indicators with direct management implications for directed ground fisheries in the Bering Sea," he said.

The Policy and Programs Director for the Kuskokwim River Intertribal Fish Commission pushed the council to treat local and traditional knowledge as part of best available science and asked whether the council's actions actually match its stated values. "Zooming out to the big picture, this policy statement and the suite of objectives should be guiding all of the work the council all of the work of the council, and the Kuskokwim Fish Commission urges the council to reflect on whether that is the case, particularly when it comes to prioritizing habitat protections, bycatch reductions, and providing sustainable opportunities for subsistence communities fishing on the same level as promoting the optimum yield of large-scale trawl fisheries. Are your values, priorities, and actions truly aligning with this policy statement, goals, and objectives?" she asked.