AlaskaNews
My Feed

Content discovery

Topics

Issues and interests

Locations

News by place

Organizations

Agencies, boards, and groups

Elections

Elections and time-bounded civic events

Calendar

Upcoming meetings and civic events

Source material

People

People quoted on the platform

Transcripts

Search every public meeting (subscribers)

Video Clips

Quoted moments on video

Photos

Community gallery

Podcasts

Articles read aloud

How It WorksLog inSign up
AlaskaNewsAlaska News

Local news, from the source.

Public meetings deserve coverage.
Every claim links to the original source.

Browse

  • My Feed
  • Topics
  • Locations
  • Organizations
  • Elections
  • People
  • TranscriptsSubscribers
  • Podcasts
  • Calendar
  • Photos
  • Video Clips

Get involved

  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Tip
  • Join a Community
  • Become a Journalist
  • Compute Volunteers
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

  • RSS
  • How It Works
  • API
  • Privacy
  • Terms

© 2026 Communities News LLC. All rights reserved.

Part of the Communities News platform

Mat-Su commission backs the $9 million road route over the $30 million one

Cover image for article: Mat-Su commission backs the $9 million road route over the $30 million one

Frame from "Mat-Su Borough: Planning Commission Meeting - August 3rd, 2026" · Source

Mat-Su commission backs the $9 million road route over the $30 million one

by Walter AlaskaNews·Aug 4, 2026(16h ago)
2 min readMat-Su Valley, AlaskaAI
Share

Mat-Su's planning commission backed a $9 million southern road route over a northern one pegged at up to $31 million, overruling a staff recommendation. The assembly decides next.

The Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Commission rejected a northern route for a new connector between Engstrom Road and Trunk Road on Monday and instead backed a southern route that speakers put at roughly $9 million. The northern option was cited at $21 million to $31 million, more than twice the southern estimate.

Six commissioners voted against the main motion, and it failed. Planning and Land Use Director Alex Strawn then read a substitute measure backing the southern route into the record, and the commission adopted it without objection.

The substitute rests largely on safety. It finds that a southern connector between Trunk Road and Engstrom Road would give Central Gravel Products an alternative primary access, and would pull the majority of the company's truck traffic off the stretch of Bogard Road between Trunk and Engstrom and out of the Engstrom-Bogard intersection. It also contrasts the strong opposition of northern-route landowners to negotiating right-of-way with the southern route's primary property owner, who has gone on record offering to provide it.

Cole Branham, the borough's project management division manager, had recommended the northern route. He said it offered "the best overall balance of connectivity, resilience, access, future growth, and public support for this project," and would carry nearly double the traffic, a little over 1,300 vehicles per day against roughly 740 for the southern route.

That recommendation differs from the borough's own published project materials, which identify the southern alignment as preferred based on long-term planning, topography, use and public input. Neither Branham nor the commissioners reconciled that with his later remark that no funding has been identified to move the project into design at all.

The southern route runs about 0.9 miles, beginning roughly 0.4 miles north of the Bogard-Engstrom intersection and merging into North Old Homestead Road. It was the alignment presented to voters in TIP 21 and identified as preferred in an October 2025 route selection report.

Several residents testified for it. Rod Hanson, speaking for the North Lakes Community Council, said his council and the Fishhook Community Council both strongly support a southern route and that it "should have been built years ago." Gravel pit owner Jade Laughlin was blunter: "The southern run is the only one that makes sense. The borough can't afford $30 million, much more than they can't afford $9 million."

The substitute now goes to the borough assembly. No funding has been identified to carry the project into design.

Sources

Based on: View Transcript

This article cites 660 chunks.

InfrastructureMat-Su BoroughMat-Su Valley

AI-assisted, reviewed by editors. Spot an error?

Watch key moments from the source meeting. Click to expand.

Reviewed by Cale Green and News Bot

Related Coverage

Two Mat-Su subdivisions approved — and the small details say something about how the borough is growing

Alaska News · 2mo ago · 79% match

Mat-Su Platting Board approves Starlight Subdivision master plan over neighbor objections

Alaska News · 2w ago · 79% match

Mat-Su Borough Platting Board approves Bartlett Hills subdivision with road waiver

Alaska News · 2mo ago · 78% match

Mat-Su Planning Commission to schedule Eagle River annexation presentation

Alaska News · 1mo ago · 78% match

Mat-Su removes gravel permit barrier in Knik-Fairview

Alaska News · 2mo ago · 78% match

Stay informed. Support what matters.

Free, permanent access to local news you can verify. Subscribe to support Walter AlaskaNews and go ad-free.

SubscribeHow it works →Sign up free

Community photos

Have a photo that captures this story? Share it — the community votes on covers.

+ Sign up to add a photo

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.