AlaskaNews
My Feed

Organizations

Agencies, boards, and groups

Topics

Issues and interests

Locations

News by place

Photos

Community gallery

Podcasts

Articles read aloud

Video Clips

Quoted moments on video

CalendarHow It WorksLog inSign up
AlaskaNewsAlaska News

Reality is the source of truth.

Decentralized community newsrooms.
AI-assisted reporting. Every government meeting covered.

Browse

  • My Feed
  • Topics
  • Locations
  • Organizations
  • Podcasts
  • Calendar
  • Photos
  • Video Clips

Get involved

  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Tip
  • Join a Community
  • Become a Journalist
  • Compute Volunteers
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

  • RSS
  • How It Works
  • API
  • Privacy
  • Terms

© 2026 Community News LLC. All rights reserved.

Part of the Community News platform

House Finance delays gas line tax bill as North Slope, Kenai mayors negotiate property tax structures

Cover image for article: House Finance delays gas line tax bill as North Slope, Kenai mayors negotiate property tax structures

Frame from "House Finance, 5/29/26, 1:30pm" · Source

House Finance delays gas line tax bill as North Slope, Kenai mayors negotiate property tax structures

by Walter AlaskaNews·May 30, 2026(15h ago)
4 min read3 viewsJuneau, AlaskaAI
Share

The Alaska House Finance Committee postponed its amendment deadline Friday on SB2001, a gas line tax relief bill, as North Slope Borough and Kenai Peninsula Borough mayors negotiated property tax structures with developers. Representatives heard testimony from borough mayors and four major producers. Multiple speakers identified property tax as the main obstacle to making the project investable.

The committee plans to set the amendment deadline Monday or Tuesday. It expects to take up amendments June 8, 9 or 10 in Juneau as negotiations continue between boroughs and Alaska LNG developers over how to tax the gas treatment plant and liquefaction facilities.

SB2001 addresses taxation of natural gas project property. It includes a volumetric tax on gas throughput as an alternative to traditional property tax based on assessed facility value. The bill has been through multiple versions since the start of session. Each version attempts a different balance between making the project attractive enough to proceed and keeping enough revenue for the state and municipalities.

North Slope Borough Mayor Josiah Puckettuck told the committee Friday he cannot support the project without the ability to negotiate gas treatment plant taxes under the existing AS 29.45 property tax framework. He opposes a novel volumetric tax.

"I can't go home and say, you know, they ask, Mr. Mayor, what's the deal on AK LNG? I say, well, we lost all of our property taxes and we have no gas going to any of our communities, so there's that," Puckettuck said.

He said elected officials must look out for the best interests of all communities. Resources delivered to market or to residents should be equally shared by all.

Kenai Peninsula Mayor Peter Machicki said his borough is closer to compromise. The borough is willing to accept significantly less than full property tax to enable the project while covering community impacts.

"We're willing to negotiate to a point where we cover our costs and it will be significantly shorter than the $8.5 million structure," Machicki said.

He added that under the current terms, the borough is getting closer to being kept whole. That depends on what is known and what is not known about the impacts of the project.

The North Slope Borough operates under a tax cap formula that forces the borough to shift costs to long-term debt. The borough carries $500 million in debt and $130 million in unfunded public employee retirement liability. Six of the borough's eight communities are diesel-reliant. Puckettuck said possible spur lines to Kaktovik and Anaktuvik Pass are part of the borough's concern about receiving direct gas benefits from the project.

Puckettuck proposed keeping the gas treatment plant under the AS 29.45 property tax framework. That would allow the borough to negotiate directly with producers.

Sources

Based on: View Transcript

This article cites 474 statements.

Alaska State LegislatureKenai Peninsula BoroughNorth Slope BoroughOil & GasJuneau

AI-assisted, reviewed by editors. Spot an error?

Watch key moments from the source meeting. Click to expand.

Reviewed by News Bot

Related Coverage

Mayors Oppose Alaska LNG Tax Bill, Cite Revenue Concerns

Alaska News · 2mo ago · 5 views · 89% match

House Finance begins review of Alaska LNG tax bill with competing rate proposals

Alaska News · 2w ago · 6 views · 88% match

Alaska House Rewrites LNG Tax Bill, Raising Rate While Empowering Boroughs

Alaska News · 3w ago · 3 views · 88% match

Senate panel weighs municipal concerns over Alaska LNG tax structure

Alaska News · 1w ago · 6 views · 87% match

Alaska LNG Tax Bill Stalls as Lawmakers Demand Project Cost Data

Alaska News · 3w ago · 1 views · 87% match

"What I'm proposing is, versus fixing all the different variables at the tax structure level without the information from the inputs on how that tax structure looks, what I'm saying is I think it'd be more effective to allow that negotiation to happen between the borough and the producer," Puckettuck said.

He said the AS 29.45 framework on the gas treatment plant would enable the buck to stop at the producer, the state, and the North Slope Borough at an administrative level. That information sharing and understanding is important.

ExxonMobil, Hilcorp, and ConocoPhillips confirmed Phase 1 gas sale precedent agreements with Glenfarn. Pantheon Resources said it signed a gas sale precedent agreement with 8 Star almost two years ago. The gas it has already discovered is enough to fulfill the needs of Phase 1, Pantheon said. All four producers cited confidentiality on pricing details.

Representative Jeremy Bynum, R-Anchorage, said the property tax issue is the impediment that must be resolved to make this an investable project. The goal is to bring low-cost gas and maximum benefit to Alaskans.

"This is how do we get gas to Alaskans, and if we're going to export that gas to make it even cheaper, how do we maximize that benefit?" Bynum said.

Changes to municipal valuation or taxation of gas project property can affect required local school contributions under Alaska law. Assessed property value is a factor in determining the required local contribution for public school funding.

The committee plans to take public testimony Saturday from noon to 3 p.m. Written testimony is accepted at [email protected]. The committee will also hear additional invited testimony Monday and Tuesday. Witnesses include utilities, the Municipality of Anchorage, Department of Revenue Chief Economist Dan Stickel, and Glenfarn representatives. Representative Neal Foster, co-chair of the House Finance Committee, said the committee will return to Juneau for amendments.

Stay informed. Support what matters.

Free, permanent access to local news you can verify. Subscribe to support Walter AlaskaNews and go ad-free.

SubscribeHow it works →Sign up free

Community photos

Have a photo that captures this story? Share it — the community votes on covers.

+ Sign up to add a photo

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.