0:18
Adam Prestidge
34:24 - 34:43
“Representative Rutherford, through the chair, that's exactly correct. It's another reason why we would make the argument that this isn't necessary, because the bill already had a very clear requirement requiring a project labor agreement for the project.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 34:24 – 34:43
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
From the transcript
Is that correct? Representative Rutherford, through the chair, that's exactly correct. It's another reason why we would make the argument that this isn't necessary, because the bill already had a very clear requirement requiring a project labor agreement for the project. Okay, thank you. Thank you.
Related Coverage
Gas-line developer warns Alaska's Senate terms could drive it off
Glenfarne told lawmakers the Senate's gas-line amendments — a 9.4% investor tax, an automatic state takeover clause, tough labor rules — could make it walk. Lawmakers say they're protecting the state.
