Adam Prestidge
34:24 - 34:43
"Representative Rutherford, through the chair, that's exactly correct. It's another reason why we would make the argument that this isn't necessary, because the bill already had a very clear requirement requiring a project labor agreement for the project."
“Representative Rutherford, through the chair, that's exactly correct. It's another reason why we would make the argument that this isn't necessary, because the bill already had a very clear requirement requiring a project labor agreement for the project.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 34:24 – 34:43
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 27, 2026
From the transcript
Is that correct? Representative Rutherford, through the chair, that's exactly correct. It's another reason why we would make the argument that this isn't necessary, because the bill already had a very clear requirement requiring a project labor agreement for the project. Okay, thank you. Thank you.
Related Coverage
Gas-line developer warns Alaska's Senate terms could drive it off
Glenfarne warned an Alaska conference committee that Senate amendments to the HB 381 gas-line tax bill, including a 9.4% investor tax, could deter investment and threaten the project.
by Walter AlaskaNews1mo ago2 min readAI