Skip to main content
1:06

Keith McCormick

5:39 - 6:45

“This adds a layer of adding the charter amendment so that these are further added to the charter, can't be changed by just a future body or future mayor, police chief. It adds in the requirement for a warrant being required to track a person over time from the surveillance data. It prohibits the city from joining outside surveillance networks or purchasing bulk data.”
Timestamp
5:39 – 6:45
Community
Alaska News
Location
Anchorage
Captured at
October 14, 2026

From the transcript

This adds a layer of adding the charter amendment so that these are further added to the charter, can't be changed by just a future body or future mayor, police chief. It adds in the requirement for a warrant being required to track a person over time from the surveillance data. It prohibits the city from joining outside surveillance networks or purchasing bulk data. It also adds in the previous biometrics that I believe Member Voland was a part of that, uh, code change in 2023, facial recognition, adding that into charter as well, along with other biometrics that can be collected at a distance, meaning like gait tracking, lip reading, voice, but does not touch like, I guess, close proximity biometric data like fingerprints or DNA being collected from a person as police typically do during admits into custody.

Related Coverage

Anchorage Assembly member proposes writing police surveillance limits into city charter

Anchorage Assembly member Keith McCormick wants police surveillance limits locked into the city charter, where only voters could change them, including warrant rules for tracking and biometric data.

Cover image for article: Anchorage Assembly member proposes writing police surveillance limits into city charter