
Kiel
27:13 - 27:55
"if we're talking about building the whole thing to have a viable project, why wouldn't the cost of a Fairbanks spur be spread across all purchasers of gas, including foreign LNG buyers?"
“if we're talking about building the whole thing to have a viable project, why wouldn't the cost of a Fairbanks spur be spread across all purchasers of gas, including foreign LNG buyers?”
- Speaker
- Kiel
- Timestamp
- 27:13 – 27:55
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Juneau
- Captured at
- June 10, 2026
From the transcript
I guess the more we look at these numbers, the more convinced I am that affordable gas only comes, as you said, with the full export project. And I have yet to see a set of numbers that could even plausibly deliver $16 in-state gas without the export project. So if we're talking about the— if we're talking about building the whole thing to have a viable project, why wouldn't the cost of a Fairbanks spur be spread across all purchasers of gas, including foreign LNG buyers?
Related Coverage
Anchorage's mayor told Senate Finance LNG could cost "tens of millions of dollars"
Anchorage's mayor said LNG would cost "tens of millions." The Halcyon report shows $23M-$173M depending on housing supply. Her housing plan targets $23M.

Fairbanks spur line language added to Alaska LNG tax bill
Fairbanks North Star Borough secured developer agreement on spur line construction tied to tax breaks, with postage-stamp rate language now central to Senate Finance deliberations on SB 2001.
