“under the bill before the committee, we assume that the property tax would remain in place. For the gas treatment plant and for the LNG facility. Municipalities have the authority under the legislation before the committee to negotiate down that property tax or potentially replace it with a negotiated equity share.”
So under— this has to do primarily with how the alternative volumetric tax is set up and modeled. So under the bill before the committee, we assume that the property tax would remain in place. For the gas treatment plant and for the LNG facility. Municipalities have the authority under the legislation before the committee to negotiate down that property tax or potentially replace it with a negotiated equity share. For modeling purposes, we've assumed that the property tax will remain or that some arrangement with a similar municipal revenue will be put into place.
The Alaska LNG project would struggle to compete in global markets even under the governor's proposed tax relief, with breakeven prices at the high end of current futures markets, according to state modeling presented to the House Finance Committee on Thursday.

The Alaska House Finance Committee heard Thursday that the governor's version of HB 381 would reduce municipal property tax revenue from the Alaska LNG project by over $13 billion compared to current law, while the House Resources version would actually increase municipal revenue by retaining property tax on the gas treatment plant and LNG facility.
