1:08
Jeremiah Gardner
48:30 - 49:38
"it was brought to my attention that I believe there was sort of an informal protest letter written on this, and I'm not going to say that we shouldn't award this to JNR. What I do think we need to do is clarify and make— we have in our code, Chapter 2.35010, Section E, it says a municipal officer, appointed official, or employee may not use his official position for the primary purpose of obtaining financial gain for himself or his spouse, child, mother, father, or business. Um, not that it is, uh, the primary financial gain in this situation But the optics of this look a little bad to certain people in the community. I think it would be wise to extend the current contract for 1 month and talk about how we want to approach this situation and basically put this back out to bid so that we can clean up the optics on it. So I will be voting no on this one."
“it was brought to my attention that I believe there was sort of an informal protest letter written on this, and I'm not going to say that we shouldn't award this to JNR. What I do think we need to do is clarify and make— we have in our code, Chapter 2.35010, Section E, it says a municipal officer, appointed official, or employee may not use his official position for the primary purpose of obtaining financial gain for himself or his spouse, child, mother, father, or business. Um, not that it is, uh, the primary financial gain in this situation But the optics of this look a little bad to certain people in the community. I think it would be wise to extend the current contract for 1 month and talk about how we want to approach this situation and basically put this back out to bid so that we can clean up the optics on it. So I will be voting no on this one.”
- Speaker
- Jeremiah Gardner
- Timestamp
- 48:30 – 49:38
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Kodiak
- Captured at
- July 2, 2026
From the transcript
It was brought to my attention that I believe there was sort of an informal protest letter written on this, and I'm not going to say that we shouldn't award this to JNR. What I do think we need to do is clarify and make— we have in our code, Chapter 2.35010, Section E, it says a municipal officer, appointed official, or employee may not use his official position for the primary purpose of obtaining financial gain for himself or his spouse, child, mother, father, or business. Um, not that it is, uh, the primary financial gain in this situation But the optics of this look a little bad to certain people in the community. I think it would be wise to extend the current contract for 1 month and talk about how we want to approach this situation and basically put this back out to bid so that we can clean up the optics on it. So I will be voting no on this one.