From the transcript

In that particular case, the net result was that a crime was affected by having that evidence set aside and that the smuggler did not get convicted. So I think that is probably not the case that you would use to justify saying that that was a violation of that person's rights. And when Member Gerker asked, would criminals get away in such a circumstance, the answer is yes. There would be cases where the criminal would in effect, get away with that smuggling of those drugs. So I'm not, I'm not convinced that that particular use was inappropriate, and I would be voting against this particular amendment.