Nathaniel Charbonneau
80:09 - 80:34
"So since we want them all on public utilities because they're living in the city limits, why are we opening up another window to not have them on public utilities?"
“So since we want them all on public utilities because they're living in the city limits, why are we opening up another window to not have them on public utilities?”
- Speaker
- Nathaniel Charbonneau
- Timestamp
- 80:09 – 80:34
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Seward
- Captured at
- September 1, 2026
From the transcript
So since we want them all on public utilities because they're living in the city limits, why are we opening up another window to not have them on public utilities? Well, the condition is you're going to get on public utilities if you're within 400 feet, otherwise it's cost-prohibited. Prohibited. Why even put it in there? We're just gonna have another, another issue down the road to try get people on if they get off of them?
Related Coverage
Seward would allow rainwater catchment in new subdivisions, but only by waiver
Seward's Planning and Zoning Commission sent a code rewrite to the City Council requiring new subdivisions to connect to city water, with rain catchment by waiver only.
by Walter AlaskaNewsadded 1w ago1 min readAI