0:27
Jeff Woods
71:26 - 71:54
“our deliberations here are absolutely subject to public scrutiny. What we do behind closed doors, especially for something that is as likely to get litigated as this, is really just weakening our position if something does get litigated. Uh, it can serve no benefit aside from a modicum of transparency, which I really don't feel like that juice is worth to squeeze in this particular instance when it comes to the high likelihood of litigation in this case. We're basically doing opposing counsel's work for them by releasing information.”
- Speaker
- Jeff Woods
- Timestamp
- 71:26 – 71:54
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
From the transcript
It— our deliberations here are absolutely subject to public scrutiny. What we do behind closed doors, especially for something that is as likely to get litigated as this, is really just weakening our position if something does get litigated. Uh, it can serve no benefit aside from a modicum of transparency, which I really don't feel like that juice is worth to squeeze in this particular instance when it comes to the high likelihood of litigation in this case. We're basically doing opposing counsel's work for them by releasing information.