Skip to main content
0:26

Steve Giesbrecht

69:19 - 69:45

"if, if the money was taken from water, wastewater, or power and light, it would have to be paid back. But for the harbor, there's an exception in how the charter is written. So yes, the money could come out of the harbor fund and would not have to be paid back."

“if, if the money was taken from water, wastewater, or power and light, it would have to be paid back. But for the harbor, there's an exception in how the charter is written. So yes, the money could come out of the harbor fund and would not have to be paid back.”
Community
Alaska News
Captured at
October 21, 2026

From the transcript

Um, if, if the money was taken from water, wastewater, or power and light, it would have to be paid back. But for the harbor, there's an exception in how the charter is written. So yes, the money could come out of the harbor fund and would not have to be paid back. But we also don't— I can't answer sitting here what that would do to any harbor projects that are already planned. We'd have to answer that question, but would not have to be paid back.

Related Coverage

Petersburg mayor asks Assembly to decide on a permanent fire training site near Station 1

Petersburg's fire training props must leave Scow Bay by Nov. 30 for storage. Mayor Bob Lynn wants the assembly to decide on a permanent site near Fire Station 1 and asked the manager for funding options by December.

Walter AlaskaNewsby Walter AlaskaNews1h ago3 min read
Petersburg, Alaska
Cover image for article: Petersburg mayor asks Assembly to decide on a permanent fire training site near Station 1

Petersburg Assembly advances union wage money before members vote, rejecting a delay 3-3

Petersburg's assembly passed a budget ordinance with union wage money on second reading Tuesday, 5-1. A motion to wait for a union membership vote failed 3-3. A third reading remains.

Walter AlaskaNewsby Walter AlaskaNews1h ago2 min read
Petersburg, Alaska
Cover image for article: Petersburg Assembly advances union wage money before members vote, rejecting a delay 3-3