0:06
Speaker A
2:14 - 2:20
"The Supreme Court held that those arguments were waived by insufficient briefing and did not consider those other arguments in its decision."
“The Supreme Court held that those arguments were waived by insufficient briefing and did not consider those other arguments in its decision.”
- Speaker
- Speaker A
- Timestamp
- 2:14 – 2:20
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- September 9, 2026
From the transcript
The Supreme Court held that those arguments were waived by insufficient briefing and did not consider those other arguments in its decision.
Related Coverage
Alaska Supreme Court says a judge may remove a plaintiff from his own trial, after warnings
The Alaska Supreme Court held for the first time that a trial judge may exclude a disruptive civil plaintiff from his own trial after warnings, ruling in a June 5, 2026 property-line case that the right to be present is weaker in civil cases than in criminal ones.
by Walter AlaskaNews1w ago2 min readAIAlaska
