Skip to main content
0:50

Tim Altman

31:21 - 32:11

"it became evident that there was differences in the data that was being used because the vessel agreements were being updated at various different times. But for example, there would be differences, say, in the length of the boat."

“it became evident that there was differences in the data that was being used because the vessel agreements were being updated at various different times. But for example, there would be differences, say, in the length of the boat.”
Speaker
Tim Altman
Community
Alaska News
Captured at
October 20, 2026

From the transcript

So in doing that, we ran a bunch of different evaluations off of the data that was available, data being information that's provided by the boat owners, information that's in the ordinances, and trying to evaluate how the auditors have come across these findings and these billing errors. Well, as this process continued, part of our evaluation, it became evident that there was differences in the data that was being used because the vessel agreements were being updated at various different times. But for example, there would be differences, say, in the length of the boat. Um, and so this would appear then to be part of the problem that was causing some of these billing errors. So We went ahead and we have now completed an analysis of all the billings for FY26 and have actually completed the last bill that went out, I think was in mid-October, and that was for September, and we've evaluated that one also.

Related Coverage

Kodiak's new harbor billing check flags about a quarter of statements, consultants say

Consultants told the Kodiak City Council a new tool flags about 25% of harbor billing for review after the fiscal 2025 audit found weak controls over harbor billing.

Walter AlaskaNewsby Walter AlaskaNews1w ago3 min read
Kodiak, Alaska
Cover image for article: Kodiak's new harbor billing check flags about a quarter of statements, consultants say