“under current law, if the project were to proceed, there would be almost $30 billion of cumulative revenue over the life of project to the state. About $22.6 billion to the federal government and over $17 billion to the municipal governments.”
- Speaker
- Dan Stickel
- Timestamp
- 38:42 – 39:20
- Transcript
- House Finance, 5/21/26, 1:30pm
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
From the transcript
So Slide 26, this is the first of 3. 3 Similar slides has a little bit of information going on. So the cash flow summary at the top here shows the cumulative revenues to the various stakeholders over 10, 20, and 30 years of full export operations. So we can see that under current law, if the project were to proceed, there would be almost $30 billion of cumulative revenue over the life of project to the state. About $22.6 billion to the federal government and over $17 billion to the municipal governments.
Related Coverage
Alaska gas line faces economic challenge even with tax breaks
Alaska LNG needs $8.48 to $9.07 per thousand cubic feet to break even, but global prices are $8 to $9. • Governor's tax plan cuts state revenue from $29.7 billion to $22.5 billion over the project's life. • Capital cost overruns and producer gas prices pose bigger risks than tax relief can fix. • State could invest $4.4 billion for a 25 percent equity stake.
House Resources gas line bill would cost municipalities $13B under governor's plan
Governor's plan cuts municipal revenue by $13 billion, House Resources version cuts only $2 billion • Governor replaces property tax with volumetric tax statewide, House Resources keeps property tax on facilities • Both versions reduce state revenue, project remains economically challenged at current market prices
