“we came up with a baseline cost of supply to utilities of $22.70 under our current law scenario and $18.60 under our as introduced by the Governor scenario. Those would be higher than the price of imported gas. And what that really highlights is that the true benefit of this project comes from the the full project that includes the export sales.”
- Speaker
- Dan Stickel
- Timestamp
- 75:11 – 75:43
- Transcript
- House Finance, 5/21/26, 1:30pm
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
From the transcript
Um, and when you weight that out against a utility price, we came up with a baseline cost of supply to utilities of $22.70 under our current law scenario and $18.60 under our as introduced by the Governor scenario. Those would be higher than the price of imported gas. And what that really highlights is that the true benefit of this project comes from the the full project that includes the export sales.
Related Coverage
Alaska gas line faces economic challenge even with tax breaks
Alaska LNG needs $8.48 to $9.07 per thousand cubic feet to break even, but global prices are $8 to $9. • Governor's tax plan cuts state revenue from $29.7 billion to $22.5 billion over the project's life. • Capital cost overruns and producer gas prices pose bigger risks than tax relief can fix. • State could invest $4.4 billion for a 25 percent equity stake.
House Resources gas line bill would cost municipalities $13B under governor's plan
Governor's plan cuts municipal revenue by $13 billion, House Resources version cuts only $2 billion • Governor replaces property tax with volumetric tax statewide, House Resources keeps property tax on facilities • Both versions reduce state revenue, project remains economically challenged at current market prices
