
Tom Carpenter
199:35 - 200:05
"To me, new information is not something that was thrown out by somebody at the Department of Law. New information would be something that the board has brought to the attention, and I haven't heard anything personally that's different than the conversation that we had when 141 was passed."
“To me, new information is not something that was thrown out by somebody at the Department of Law. New information would be something that the board has brought to the attention, and I haven't heard anything personally that's different than the conversation that we had when 141 was passed.”
- Speaker
- Tom Carpenter
- Timestamp
- 199:35 – 200:05
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Anchorage
- Captured at
- October 29, 2026
From the transcript
Mr. Carpenter, thank you. Thank you for allowing me. I know the question's been called, but it's an interesting point you bring up, Mr. Lee, that the board can consider an ACR if it's predominantly allocative as long as there's new information that's been provided To me, new information is not something that was thrown out by somebody at the Department of Law. New information would be something that the board has brought to the attention, and I haven't heard anything personally that's different than the conversation that we had when 141 was passed. So to me, rationalizing that and saying that this isn't predominantly allocated based on that criteria, I don't, I don't think that this meets that threshold at all.
Related Coverage
Fish board agrees to reconsider Area M salmon limits the state voided in May
The Alaska Board of Fisheries voted 4-3 to reconsider voided Area M salmon limits meant to protect Western Alaska chum, with a special meeting eyed for December or February.

Alaska Board of Fisheries picks Bethel and Dillingham for 2028 regional finfish meetings
Alaska Board of Fisheries votes 7-0 to hold its 2028 Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim finfish meeting in Bethel and 5-2 to hold its Bristol Bay meeting in Dillingham.
