From the transcript

So that case is a recently decided case, U.S. v. Kyle, is a Northern District of Oklahoma case, so a federal trial court. It has not gone through appellate review yet, and I will say that case is an outlier. The court decision in that itself, in that, in the opinion that made those findings, said based on the court's research, it appears that nearly every court every court examining the issue to date has determined that ALPR technology use is not a search under the Fourth Amendment because people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their movements on public streets. And so the court, that decision acknowledged it was going out on a limb there where other courts had not been going. By contrast, trial courts across the country, federal trial courts in Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Kansas, Nebraska, Illinois, Florida, New Jersey, most of them within the past couple of years, so not, you know, several years ago before this technology's power was known, have found, have held the other way.