0:26
Jason Norris
11:40 - 12:06
"I was wondering, in B1, the increase from 5% to 10%, what was the logic behind that? Is it because you saw a large number of potential minor modifications that would have been approved if it was 10%? Or was it that you felt that that was reasonable to ask for in one bite?"
“I was wondering, in B1, the increase from 5% to 10%, what was the logic behind that? Is it because you saw a large number of potential minor modifications that would have been approved if it was 10%? Or was it that you felt that that was reasonable to ask for in one bite?”
- Speaker
- Jason Norris
- Timestamp
- 11:40 – 12:06
- Source
- Anchorage Assembly: Zoning Board of Examiners and Appeals - June 11, 2026 - 2026-06-11 18:30:00
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Anchorage
- Captured at
- June 12, 2026
From the transcript
Mr. Narms. Yeah, through the chair, good evening. I was wondering, in B1, the increase from 5% to 10%, what was the logic behind that? Is it because you saw a large number of potential minor modifications that would have been approved if it was 10%? Or was it that you felt that that was reasonable to ask for in one bite?
Related Coverage
Anchorage zoning board postpones variance threshold changes
The Anchorage Zoning Board postponed a proposed ordinance Friday that would double the threshold for administrative approval of setback encroachments from 5 percent to 10 percent. Members requested data on how many cases would be resolved administratively under different thresholds and asked legal counsel to clarify whether all eight approval criteria must be met.
by Walter AlaskaNews3h ago2 min readAIAnchorage
