Skip to main content
0:49

Jared Gardner

101:31 - 102:21

“We heard some testimony from some of the neighbors this evening with concerns about implications from the rezone, and I think, um, those should be relatively limited for a couple of reasons.”
Community
Alaska News
Location
Peters Creek, Anchorage
Captured at

From the transcript

We heard some testimony from some of the neighbors this evening with concerns about implications from the rezone, and I think, um, those should be relatively limited for a couple of reasons. One is that it doesn't change the existing use. It's been a residential property for— we heard testimony that the property was built in 2006, so a significant period of time. And, um, from our review of the applicable special limitations, it doesn't look like it will materially add new buffer requirements. There is the potential for additional landscaping requirements for being adjacent to a residential district, but those don't immediately come into play, and that applies to both properties.

Related Coverage

Planning commission backs rezone to legalize Chugiak house built on industrial land

A Chugiak house built without permits in 2006 sits on industrial land. Planners backed rezoning it residential; its industrial neighbors aren't thrilled.

Cover image for article: Planning commission backs rezone to legalize Chugiak house built on industrial land