Skip to main content
0:37

Sheldon Whitehouse

23:24 - 24:02

“Not cutting all funding for endangered species conservation, including iconic species such as elephants, rhinos, and great apes. Not cutting science support, which provides technical assistance to local communities. For wildlife and habitat conservation, not cutting state and tribal grants which help conserve fish and wildlife before they require protection under the Endangered Species Act.”
Community
Alaska News
Location
Alaska
Captured at

From the transcript

I very much doubt that the 530 staff biologists who left the agency felt deeply valued. The proposed funding cuts won't help. Not cutting all funding for endangered species conservation, including iconic species such as elephants, rhinos, and great apes. Not cutting science support, which provides technical assistance to local communities. For wildlife and habitat conservation, not cutting state and tribal grants which help conserve fish and wildlife before they require protection under the Endangered Species Act.

Related Coverage

A federal expansion of hunting and fishing access on national wildlife refuges would land most heavily in Alaska

They're making changes to national wildlife refuges? We got a lot of them.

Cover image for article: A federal expansion of hunting and fishing access on national wildlife refuges would land most heavily in Alaska

Fish and Wildlife lost quarter of staff, faces questions on refuge management

Fish and Wildlife Service lost a quarter of its staff, including 530 biologists. Nine percent of refuges now lack on-ground management. Alaska holds 16 refuges covering three-quarters of the system's acreage, but the agency has not disclosed which Alaska refuges are shuttered or how many Alaska staff were cut.

Cover image for article: Fish and Wildlife lost quarter of staff, faces questions on refuge management

Fish and Wildlife Service seeks $5M to cut energy permit times in half

Fish and Wildlife Service is asking Congress for $5.1 million to cut endangered species review times from 30 to 14 days, a change that could speed up Alaska energy and mineral projects that have faced years of federal delays.

Cover image for article: Fish and Wildlife Service seeks $5M to cut energy permit times in half