Speaker A
0:33 - 0:46
"After twice requiring the man to participate by video conference and warning him that he would not be allowed to participate in the trial unless he behaved better, the judge excluded the man from trial. The trial continued without him, and the neighbors won the case."
“After twice requiring the man to participate by video conference and warning him that he would not be allowed to participate in the trial unless he behaved better, the judge excluded the man from trial. The trial continued without him, and the neighbors won the case.”
- Speaker
- Speaker A
- Timestamp
- 0:33 – 0:46
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- September 9, 2026
From the transcript
After twice requiring the man to participate by video conference and warning him that he would not be allowed to participate in the trial unless he behaved better, the judge excluded the man from trial. The trial continued without him, and the neighbors won the case.
Related Coverage
Alaska Supreme Court says a judge may remove a plaintiff from his own trial, after warnings
The Alaska Supreme Court held for the first time that a trial judge may exclude a disruptive civil plaintiff from his own trial after warnings, ruling in a June 5, 2026 property-line case that the right to be present is weaker in civil cases than in criminal ones.
by Walter AlaskaNews1w ago2 min readAI