Name: Adam Prestidge: The deadline of 2037 is well within— well beyond the project completion deadline, even if we put a couple years of contingency on that. And so a 2037 deadline doesn't have that same risk profile to the FID investors. And so for that reason, we suggest deleting the 2032 deadline.
Uploaded: 2026-06-27T18:00:00+00:00
Duration: 27 s
Description: The deadline of 2037 is well within— well beyond the project completion deadline, even if we put a couple years of contingency on that. And so a 2037 deadline doesn't have that same risk profile to the FID investors. And so for that reason, we suggest deleting the 2032 deadline.

0:26

Adam Prestidge

116:28 - 116:54

“The deadline of 2037 is well within— well beyond the project completion deadline, even if we put a couple years of contingency on that. And so a 2037 deadline doesn't have that same risk profile to the FID investors. And so for that reason, we suggest deleting the 2032 deadline.”

Speaker: Adam Prestidge
Timestamp: 116:28 – 116:54
Transcript: Alaska Legislature: Joint Conference on HB381, 6/27/26, 10am
Community: Alaska News
Location: Alaska
Captured at: June 27, 2026

From the transcript

The deadline of 2037 is well within— well beyond the project completion deadline, even if we put a couple years of contingency on that. And so a 2037 deadline doesn't have that same risk profile to the FID investors. And so for that reason, we suggest deleting the 2032 deadline. Speaker Edgeman.

View full transcript