Kevin Cross
22:06 - 22:37
"my understanding based on what I just heard is that we have two opposing plats. We have an MOA plat and we have a DOT plat, and we're talking about an aerial easement— excuse me, a floating right-of-way easement that's only on the DOT plat but not on the MOA plat, in which case Is there one that supersedes the other?"
“my understanding based on what I just heard is that we have two opposing plats. We have an MOA plat and we have a DOT plat, and we're talking about an aerial easement— excuse me, a floating right-of-way easement that's only on the DOT plat but not on the MOA plat, in which case Is there one that supersedes the other?”
- Speaker
- Kevin Cross
- Timestamp
- 22:06 – 22:37
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
- July 2, 2026
From the transcript
Mr. Cross, through the chair, um, to staff. So my understanding based on what I just heard is that we have two opposing plats. We have an MOA plat and we have a DOT plat, and we're talking about an aerial easement— excuse me, a floating right-of-way easement that's only on the DOT plat but not on the MOA plat, in which case Is there one that supersedes the other? Is there one, or— and if it's not in the MOA plat, then we can— then why are we adding to it? I don't like plat notes.
Related Coverage
A Knik Arm bridge easement survives — and so does the debate
The Anchorage Platting Board kept a Knik Arm Crossing easement on a Port of Alaska plat, preserving the option for a long-debated bridge linking Anchorage and the Mat-Su.
by Walter AlaskaNews1mo ago2 min readAI