
Skyler Quinn
27:03 - 27:36
"whether this plat note stays on or is— or gets removed is kind of moot point because it's already on the state plat. So, um, I agree with the logic of the, uh, of the presenter, and I think that I agree with Mr. Cross where a lot of plat notes are just not needed and muddy the waters more com— more often than not, but I don't really see removing this, um, making much of a difference."
“whether this plat note stays on or is— or gets removed is kind of moot point because it's already on the state plat. So, um, I agree with the logic of the, uh, of the presenter, and I think that I agree with Mr. Cross where a lot of plat notes are just not needed and muddy the waters more com— more often than not, but I don't really see removing this, um, making much of a difference.”
Seeing none, pass the gavel over. Um, I agree with Ms. Mills and Mr. Cross. Honestly, I think that this— whether this plat note stays on or is— or gets removed is kind of moot point because it's already on the state plat. So, um, I agree with the logic of the, uh, of the presenter, and I think that I agree with Mr. Cross where a lot of plat notes are just not needed and muddy the waters more com— more often than not, but I don't really see removing this, um, making much of a difference. So with that, I'm going to vote in support.
The Anchorage Platting Board voted July 1 to approve a Port of Alaska subdivision plat without removing a floating right-of-way easement for the Knik Arm Crossing, a bridge with no funding, no place in current transportation plans, and toll projections one engineer called fraudulent. Board members concluded the municipal plat note was largely symbolic because the easement already exists on a state DOT plat that supersedes local authority.
