Skip to main content
0:33

Skyler Quinn

27:03 - 27:36

“whether this plat note stays on or is— or gets removed is kind of moot point because it's already on the state plat. So, um, I agree with the logic of the, uh, of the presenter, and I think that I agree with Mr. Cross where a lot of plat notes are just not needed and muddy the waters more com— more often than not, but I don't really see removing this, um, making much of a difference.”
Community
Alaska News
Captured at
July 2, 2026

From the transcript

Seeing none, pass the gavel over. Um, I agree with Ms. Mills and Mr. Cross. Honestly, I think that this— whether this plat note stays on or is— or gets removed is kind of moot point because it's already on the state plat. So, um, I agree with the logic of the, uh, of the presenter, and I think that I agree with Mr. Cross where a lot of plat notes are just not needed and muddy the waters more com— more often than not, but I don't really see removing this, um, making much of a difference. So with that, I'm going to vote in support.

Related Coverage

A Knik Arm bridge easement survives — and so does the debate

Anchorage kept a Knik Arm Crossing easement on a port plat — a small vote that keeps alive a long-debated bridge backers call vital resiliency and skeptics call unfunded.

Cover image for article: A Knik Arm bridge easement survives — and so does the debate