Nick Mangini
46:12 - 46:21
"if we're only charging a 100-foot boat that's actually 120 feet, it's a big inconsistency. In '26 alone, this cost us $131,000."
“if we're only charging a 100-foot boat that's actually 120 feet, it's a big inconsistency. In '26 alone, this cost us $131,000.”
- Speaker
- Nick Mangini
- Timestamp
- 46:12 – 46:21
- Transcript
- Kodiak: October 20, 2026, Work Session
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
- October 20, 2026
From the transcript
And I think that because we're adding this insurance clause, to our harbor agreements, it's a good opportunity to get everybody on a level playing field where we're going to have access to actual vessel lengths. We're not calling somebody and saying, what, how long is your boat? You're going to be able to see, you know, what they're reporting to their insurance, which you would hope would be the proper vessel length. And it's very important to our finances because if we're only charging a 100-foot boat that's actually 120 feet, it's a big inconsistency. In '26 alone, this cost us $131,000.
Related Coverage
Kodiak's new harbor billing check flags about a quarter of statements, consultants say
Consultants told the Kodiak City Council a new tool flags about 25% of harbor billing for review after the fiscal 2025 audit found weak controls over harbor billing.
by Walter AlaskaNews3h ago3 min read