0:24
Adam Prestidge
111:37 - 112:01
"Extending it to all of the ratepayers across Alaska stretches that concept a little bit. Extending it to global LNG buyers extends it far outside of the bounds of commercial sensibility. And so we recommend removing that."
“Extending it to all of the ratepayers across Alaska stretches that concept a little bit. Extending it to global LNG buyers extends it far outside of the bounds of commercial sensibility. And so we recommend removing that.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 111:37 – 112:01
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Juneau
- Captured at
- June 16, 2026
From the transcript
Extending it to all of the ratepayers across Alaska stretches that concept a little bit. Extending it to global LNG buyers extends it far outside of the bounds of commercial sensibility. And so we recommend removing that. I think it also opens up a number of questions of jurisdiction over the LNG project and LNG sales and— [FOREIGN LANGUAGE] becomes quite complicated. So we recommend removing that as one of the technical cleanups to the bill.
Related Coverage
Senate Finance presses Alaska LNG spur line: who builds, who pays, who regulates
The Alaska Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday heard unresolved questions about who will build, own, and regulate a proposed Fairbanks natural gas spur line, how its cost should be spread across ratepayers, and whether HB 381's spur commitment is firm enough to guarantee construction.
by Walter AlaskaNews2h ago3 min readAIFairbanks, Alaska
