Skip to main content
0:32

Calvin Schrage

77:34 - 78:07

"This brings us back to where we were prior to that amendment, reenacts the status quo, and again provides additional protection for ratepayers from unnecessary costs being passed on to them, and I think it's a step in the right direction."

“This brings us back to where we were prior to that amendment, reenacts the status quo, and again provides additional protection for ratepayers from unnecessary costs being passed on to them, and I think it's a step in the right direction.”
Community
Alaska News
Captured at
June 9, 2026

From the transcript

We have heard from RCA commissioners on the record that when that repeal was enacted, it has caused confusion in rate cases and posed, frankly, a litigation risk. This brings us back to where we were prior to that amendment, reenacts the status quo, and again provides additional protection for ratepayers from unnecessary costs being passed on to them, and I think it's a step in the right direction. So I would ask for committee members' support. I'm seated. Sorry.

Related Coverage

Same committee, same day, two close votes on Alaska LNG ratepayer protection — and they didn't go the same way

Alaska House Finance Committee voted 6-5 Tuesday to direct the Regulatory Commission of Alaska not to approve contracts that pass Alaska LNG cost overruns to ratepayers. The developer confirmed support for the protection.

Walter AlaskaNewsby Walter AlaskaNews4mo ago2 min read
Juneau, Alaska
Cover image for article: Same committee, same day, two close votes on Alaska LNG ratepayer protection — and they didn't go the same way