
Alexi Painter
41:03 - 41:48
"For Phase 2, your annual AVT revenue would be 8 cents times 500,000 times 365 plus 10 cents times 2.5 million times 365, and that's $107.3 million. And so that's roughly with that higher end cost estimate, that's a mill rate of about 1.97 mills."
“For Phase 2, your annual AVT revenue would be 8 cents times 500,000 times 365 plus 10 cents times 2.5 million times 365, and that's $107.3 million. And so that's roughly with that higher end cost estimate, that's a mill rate of about 1.97 mills.”
So for that, you would take— for the in-state, the revenue amount would be 6 cents times 500,000 times 365. That gets you $11 million per year. And then, uh, to try to turn that into a mill rate with a $16.9 billion project cost, that's a property tax rate about 0.65 mills, something like that. For Phase 2, your annual AVT revenue would be 8 cents times 500,000 times 365 plus 10 cents times 2.5 million times 365, and that's $107.3 million. And so that's roughly with that higher end cost estimate, that's a mill rate of about 1.97 mills.
Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Peter Micciche told the Alaska Senate Finance Committee Wednesday that the House version of the Alaska LNG tax bill provides a workable 70% property tax reduction, while the original 90% cut would have left local taxpayers subsidizing the project.

Legislative Finance Division analysis shows the alternative volumetric tax structure in Senate Bill 2001 would generate approximately $124 million annually when the full Alaska LNG project is operational, with Kenai Peninsula Borough receiving $55 million and North Slope Borough receiving $40 million based on capital expenditure weights.
