Dan Stickel
184:02 - 184:47
"the reason that we present that as indeterminate in terms of state impact is that we don't know for certain whether the project goes forward. So to say with certainty that we— that if you enact this provision, we will get X dollars of revenue for a provision that we don't know with certainty whether the project will go forward, we've built on assumptions which are uncertain, and then there's the uncertain impact of implementation implementing this policy on the project. And we have heard concern from industry that it would affect their investment decisions."
“the reason that we present that as indeterminate in terms of state impact is that we don't know for certain whether the project goes forward. So to say with certainty that we— that if you enact this provision, we will get X dollars of revenue for a provision that we don't know with certainty whether the project will go forward, we've built on assumptions which are uncertain, and then there's the uncertain impact of implementation implementing this policy on the project. And we have heard concern from industry that it would affect their investment decisions.”
- Speaker
- Dan Stickel
- Timestamp
- 184:02 – 184:47
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 27, 2026
From the transcript
One is for the AKLNG project, and we do have deterministic modeling under our baseline assumptions of what those potential revenues would be. From the project. The reason that we present that as indeterminate in terms of state impact is that we don't know for certain whether the project goes forward. So to say with certainty that we— that if you enact this provision, we will get X dollars of revenue for a provision that we don't know with certainty whether the project will go forward, we've built on assumptions which are uncertain, and then there's the uncertain impact of implementation implementing this policy on the project. And we have heard concern from industry that it would affect their investment decisions.
Related Coverage
Gas-line developer warns Alaska's Senate terms could drive it off
Glenfarne warned an Alaska conference committee that Senate amendments to the HB 381 gas-line tax bill, including a 9.4% investor tax, could deter investment and threaten the project.
by Walter AlaskaNews1mo ago2 min readAI