Anita Kroska
456:20 - 457:03
"Option 2 was chosen, that was put forward by the Kodiak Crab Alliance Cooperative, KCAC Group, in the April 2025 council meeting during their testimony as an option for consideration. And their— I think their intention was to draw a boundary option centered around some Tanner crab abundance densities using heat maps provided by Alaska Department of Fish and Game them during that meeting."
“Option 2 was chosen, that was put forward by the Kodiak Crab Alliance Cooperative, KCAC Group, in the April 2025 council meeting during their testimony as an option for consideration. And their— I think their intention was to draw a boundary option centered around some Tanner crab abundance densities using heat maps provided by Alaska Department of Fish and Game them during that meeting.”
- Speaker
- Anita Kroska
- Timestamp
- 456:20 – 457:03
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 6, 2026
From the transcript
In, in choosing these options, the first option was one that has been considered in past crab protection measures, as it overlays some known densities of crab. Option 2 was chosen, that was put forward by the Kodiak Crab Alliance Cooperative, KCAC Group, in the April 2025 council meeting during their testimony as an option for consideration. And their— I think their intention was to draw a boundary option centered around some Tanner crab abundance densities using heat maps provided by Alaska Department of Fish and Game them during that meeting.
Related Coverage
North Pacific council demands OLE justify enforcement fees billed to Alaska catch-share programs
The North Pacific Fishery Management Council passed motions Friday requiring NOAA's Office of Law Enforcement to document each investigation billed to Alaska's catch-share programs by regulation, hours, and apportionment formula, responding to years of industry complaints that OLE charges exceed the legal incremental-cost standard under the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
by Bill AlaskaNews1mo ago2 min readAI