
Kevin Cross
23:33 - 23:59
"So even removing it is inconsequential because it still exists on the state DOT plat? That's correct. And so which— the state supersedes our municipal requirements. So I mean, so I hope the public understands that if it's on the state plat and the MOA is subject to the state, even if it's not on the municipal plat, it still exists. So then we're just— we're providing, you know, information, emotional service, but not anything of substance."
“So even removing it is inconsequential because it still exists on the state DOT plat? That's correct. And so which— the state supersedes our municipal requirements. So I mean, so I hope the public understands that if it's on the state plat and the MOA is subject to the state, even if it's not on the municipal plat, it still exists. So then we're just— we're providing, you know, information, emotional service, but not anything of substance.”
So even removing it is inconsequential because it still exists on the state DOT plat? That's correct. And so which— the state supersedes our municipal requirements. So I mean, so I hope the public understands that if it's on the state plat and the MOA is subject to the state, even if it's not on the municipal plat, it still exists. So then we're just— we're providing, you know, information, emotional service, but not anything of substance.
The Anchorage Platting Board voted July 1 to approve a Port of Alaska subdivision plat without removing a floating right-of-way easement for the Knik Arm Crossing, a bridge with no funding, no place in current transportation plans, and toll projections one engineer called fraudulent. Board members concluded the municipal plat note was largely symbolic because the easement already exists on a state DOT plat that supersedes local authority.
