0:31
Calvin Schrage
63:27 - 63:59
"My understanding is that there is a desire to continue to have RCA oversight over LNG sales through an import facility. You know, I think it's still envisioned that there could be imports at some point, and if that is the case, I've heard loudly from many stakeholders that they'd like to see those sales under RCA jurisdiction."
“My understanding is that there is a desire to continue to have RCA oversight over LNG sales through an import facility. You know, I think it's still envisioned that there could be imports at some point, and if that is the case, I've heard loudly from many stakeholders that they'd like to see those sales under RCA jurisdiction.”
- Speaker
- Calvin Schrage
- Timestamp
- 63:27 – 63:59
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
- June 9, 2026
From the transcript
That's all. Yeah, thank you, Representative. Thank you, Co-Chair Foster, and thanks for the question, Representative Stamp. My understanding is that there is a desire to continue to have RCA oversight over LNG sales through an import facility. You know, I think it's still envisioned that there could be imports at some point, and if that is the case, I've heard loudly from many stakeholders that they'd like to see those sales under RCA jurisdiction.
Related Coverage
Same committee, same day, two close votes on Alaska LNG ratepayer protection — and they didn't go the same way
Alaska House Finance Committee voted 6-5 Tuesday to direct the Regulatory Commission of Alaska not to approve contracts that pass Alaska LNG cost overruns to ratepayers. The developer confirmed support for the protection.
by Walter AlaskaNews2h ago2 min readAIJuneau, Alaska
