Adam Prestidge
31:12 - 31:40
"if we take the example of some of the offsite fabrication that could be done internationally, paying Alaska prevailing wages at a fabrication yard in Korea, for just one example, doesn't make any sense and wouldn't be economically viable for the project."
“if we take the example of some of the offsite fabrication that could be done internationally, paying Alaska prevailing wages at a fabrication yard in Korea, for just one example, doesn't make any sense and wouldn't be economically viable for the project.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 31:12 – 31:40
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 27, 2026
From the transcript
The amendment is far broader than that. It doesn't capture kind of the detail and the complications of it. It just says that all work anywhere must be performed, must be paid prevailing wages. Again, if we take the example of some of the offsite fabrication that could be done internationally, paying Alaska prevailing wages at a fabrication yard in Korea, for just one example, doesn't make any sense and wouldn't be economically viable for the project.
Related Coverage
Gas-line developer warns Alaska's Senate terms could drive it off
Glenfarne warned an Alaska conference committee that Senate amendments to the HB 381 gas-line tax bill, including a 9.4% investor tax, could deter investment and threaten the project.
by Walter AlaskaNews1mo ago2 min readAI