
Nicholas Fulford
107:58 - 108:48
"if you took 12.5% as the going rate for LNG, With the 6-cent tax, AVT, Alaska would be profitable somewhere around the sort of $65, $70 a barrel. So really any price greater than $65 or $70 a barrel, Alaska would be in the money. Equally with the property tax, you can see that that shifts slightly to the left— sorry, to the right. And, and you're really in more of a sort of 70-75."
“if you took 12.5% as the going rate for LNG, With the 6-cent tax, AVT, Alaska would be profitable somewhere around the sort of $65, $70 a barrel. So really any price greater than $65 or $70 a barrel, Alaska would be in the money. Equally with the property tax, you can see that that shifts slightly to the left— sorry, to the right. And, and you're really in more of a sort of 70-75.”
- Speaker
- Nicholas Fulford
- Timestamp
- 107:58 – 108:48
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Juneau
- Captured at
- May 26, 2026
From the transcript
A lot of numbers on the chart, but what you can conclude from that is that if you took 12.5% as the going rate for LNG, With the 6-cent tax, AVT, Alaska would be profitable somewhere around the sort of $65, $70 a barrel. So really any price greater than $65 or $70 a barrel, Alaska would be in the money. Equally with the property tax, you can see that that shifts slightly to the left— sorry, to the right. And, and you're really in more of a sort of 70-75. So that gives you a sense of, um, the competitiveness of the gas globally and the difference between, um, where things stand today and where they could stand.
Related Coverage
Energy consultant tells House Finance that property tax makes Alaska LNG unfinanceable
House Finance Committee hears testimony on Alaska LNG property tax reform
