AlaskaNews
My Feed

Content discovery

Topics

Issues and interests

Locations

News by place

Organizations

Agencies, boards, and groups

Elections

Elections and time-bounded civic events

Calendar

Upcoming meetings and civic events

Source material

People

People quoted on the platform

Transcripts

Search every public meeting (subscribers)

Video Clips

Quoted moments on video

Photos

Community gallery

Podcasts

Articles read aloud

How It WorksLog inSign up
AlaskaNewsAlaska News

Local news, from the source.

Public meetings deserve coverage.
Every claim links to the original source.

Browse

  • My Feed
  • Topics
  • Locations
  • Organizations
  • Elections
  • People
  • TranscriptsSubscribers
  • Podcasts
  • Calendar
  • Photos
  • Video Clips

Get involved

  • Subscribe
  • Submit a Tip
  • Join a Community
  • Become a Journalist
  • Compute Volunteers
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

  • RSS
  • How It Works
  • API
  • Privacy
  • Terms

© 2026 Communities News LLC. All rights reserved.

Part of the Communities News platform

A federal royalty-rule change could shortchange the states and tribes it's owed to

Cover image for article: A federal royalty-rule change could shortchange the states and tribes it's owed to

AI-generated (Gemini Imagen)

A federal royalty-rule change could shortchange the states and tribes it's owed to

by Maggie AlaskaNews·Jun 30, 2026(3d ago)
1 min readAI
Share

A federal plan to simplify mineral royalties could shortchange states, tribes, and Native owners, as an audit finds the agency isn't collecting what it's owed.

When oil, gas, or coal comes out of public and tribal land, the royalties are supposed to flow back to the people who own it — states, tribes, and individual Native mineral owners, who receive 100 percent of the revenue from their own lands.

A federal proposal to change how those royalties are calculated has watchdogs warning that less of that money could actually make it through.

The Office of Natural Resources Revenue, the Interior Department bureau that collects and distributes those royalties — more than $10 billion in the current fiscal year alone — wants to simplify how the value of extracted minerals is calculated. The agency says the change would cut compliance costs for industry and government and, in its words, "incentivize production to unleash energy dominance."

A January audit by Interior's own inspector general found the agency was already failing to properly identify and collect the penalties owed when companies underpay.

Simplifying the valuation rules without first closing that enforcement gap, watchdog groups argue, could leave even more money owed to the public uncollected — money that would otherwise reach state treasuries, conservation funds, and tribal and Native mineral owners.

National Petroleum Reserve in AlaskaEnergyNorth SlopeNorth Slope BoroughNorthwest Arctic BoroughIndigenous Affairs

AI-assisted, reviewed by editors. Spot an error?

Reviewed by Cale Green and News Bot

Stay informed. Support what matters.

Free, permanent access to local news you can verify. Subscribe to support Maggie AlaskaNews and go ad-free.

SubscribeHow it works →Sign up free

Community photos

Have a photo that captures this story? Share it — the community votes on covers.

+ Sign up to add a photo

Comments

Sign in to leave a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.