0:35
Lyman Hoffman
27:46 - 28:22
"under that scenario, unless the legislature decides to take the investment option, there is no scenario that that Glenfarm sees that under any scenario that there would be a cash call by the state of Alaska or by Glenfarm. Chair Hoffman, that is 100% true and correct. There is no scenario where we will ask the state for money."
“under that scenario, unless the legislature decides to take the investment option, there is no scenario that that Glenfarm sees that under any scenario that there would be a cash call by the state of Alaska or by Glenfarm. Chair Hoffman, that is 100% true and correct. There is no scenario where we will ask the state for money.”
- Speaker
- Lyman Hoffman
- Timestamp
- 27:46 – 28:22
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 16, 2026
From the transcript
So under that scenario, unless the legislature decides to take the investment option, there is no scenario that that Glenfarm sees that under any scenario that there would be a cash call by the state of Alaska or by Glenfarm. Chair Hoffman, that is 100% true and correct. There is no scenario where we will ask the state for money. Even the state investment option is an option to the state. It doesn't come with a formal request or pressure from Glenfarm to make that investment option.
Related Coverage
Glenfarne: 2060 tax sunset tied to 30-year loan lenders won't shorten
Glenfarne's Adam Prestidge told the Alaska Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday that the 2060 sunset in HB 381 is non-negotiable because lenders underwriting 30-year project debt will assume the worst-case tax scenario for the full loan term if any shorter abatement is written into law.
by Walter AlaskaNews3h ago3 min readAIAlaska
