0:34
Bert Stedman
11:46 - 12:20
"I think just for clarity on the $60 billion, that is the mid-range number of the Phase 1 and Phase 2, which is $49 billion plus a 20% contingency."
“I think just for clarity on the $60 billion, that is the mid-range number of the Phase 1 and Phase 2, which is $49 billion plus a 20% contingency.”
- Speaker
- Bert Stedman
- Timestamp
- 11:46 – 12:20
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 8, 2026
From the transcript
We have that in the appendix at the end. Senator Steadman. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I think just for clarity on the $60 billion, that is the mid-range number of the Phase 1 and Phase 2, which is $49 billion plus a 20% contingency. So that's important because most of the dollar costs that are reflected in the news media is without the 20% contingency.
Related Coverage
Department of Revenue presents Senate Finance with Alaska LNG breakeven modeling across cost and tax scenarios
Department of Revenue modeling shows that if the Alaska LNG project costs $60 billion instead of the baseline $46.2 billion, the price needed to break even in global markets would jump by $1.60 per thousand cubic feet, significantly affecting project viability and the state's fiscal analysis of competing tax proposals.
by Walter AlaskaNews1h ago2 min readAIAlaska
Department of Revenue presents Senate Finance with 25-scenario sensitivity analysis on Alaska LNG fiscal impact
Alaska Department of Revenue modeling shows the Alaska LNG project could cost the state $16.2 billion through 2062 under worst-case production scenarios combining Prudhoe Bay oil losses with Point Thompson underperformance at $100 per barrel oil prices.
by Walter AlaskaNews1h ago2 min readAIAlaska
