Speaker B
68:30 - 69:07
"they also had language saying that 110% of the height of the tower was the distance you had to be from another property, from property line. So we would want that also, right?"
“they also had language saying that 110% of the height of the tower was the distance you had to be from another property, from property line. So we would want that also, right?”
- Speaker
- Speaker B
- Timestamp
- 68:30 – 69:07
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
- May 12, 2026
From the transcript
So it kind of depends on—. Well, they also had language saying that 110% of the height of the tower was the distance you had to be from another property, from property line. So we would want that also, right? Okay, so we can have our two requirements be for buy right, the setback being 110% of the tower height, and the tower height being I wish I knew the number off the top of my head, but it's the FAA tower height, you know, that whatever they have— maybe 200 feet. Yeah, if it's over 200 feet, then you have to go through the conditional use process.
Related Coverage
Planning Commission maps cell tower sites to guide wireless companies
Petersburg's Planning Commission on Tuesday identified multiple potential sites for a cell tower overlay zone ordinance, including borough-owned land near the Baylor facility, Forest Service property above Scow Bay, and state land along Three Lakes Loop Road, aiming to give the community more control over tower placement while complying with federal telecommunications law.
by Walter AlaskaNews3mo ago2 min readAI