Skip to main content
0:18

Speaker B

83:09 - 83:27

"that $100 per barrel oil impact scenario with the worst-case production scenario under Senate Bill 2001 as introduced by the Governor, which would be a $16.2 billion reduction to state revenue through 2062 in this scenario."

that $100 per barrel oil impact scenario with the worst-case production scenario under Senate Bill 2001 as introduced by the Governor, which would be a $16.2 billion reduction to state revenue through 2062 in this scenario.
Speaker
Speaker B
Community
Alaska News
Location
Alaska
Captured at
June 8, 2026

From the transcript

Slide 54 is that $100 per barrel oil impact scenario with the worst-case production scenario under Senate Bill 2001 as introduced by the Governor, which would be a $16.2 billion reduction to state revenue through 2062 in this scenario.

Related Coverage

Department of Revenue presents Senate Finance with Alaska LNG breakeven modeling across cost and tax scenarios

Department of Revenue modeling shows that if the Alaska LNG project costs $60 billion instead of the baseline $46.2 billion, the price needed to break even in global markets would jump by $1.60 per thousand cubic feet, significantly affecting project viability and the state's fiscal analysis of competing tax proposals.

Walter AlaskaNewsby Walter AlaskaNews3mo ago2 min readAI
Alaska
Cover image for article: Department of Revenue presents Senate Finance with Alaska LNG breakeven modeling across cost and tax scenarios

Department of Revenue presents Senate Finance with 25-scenario sensitivity analysis on Alaska LNG fiscal impact

Alaska Department of Revenue modeling shows the Alaska LNG project could cost the state $16.2 billion through 2062 under worst-case production scenarios combining Prudhoe Bay oil losses with Point Thompson underperformance at $100 per barrel oil prices.

Walter AlaskaNewsby Walter AlaskaNews3mo ago2 min readAI
Alaska
Cover image for article: Department of Revenue presents Senate Finance with 25-scenario sensitivity analysis on Alaska LNG fiscal impact