
Bert Stedman
125:18 - 126:14
"we're being told here at the table it may cost 45 billion or it may cost 90 billion. It's not an acceptable answer, just not an acceptable answer."
“we're being told here at the table it may cost 45 billion or it may cost 90 billion. It's not an acceptable answer, just not an acceptable answer.”
And it's hard, it's hard for the Department of Revenue which I think prides themselves on giving the Finance committee accurate information. When we sit in to have our discussion on capital expenditures in oil basin, you know, with a five year look forward to the last couple years they have a six month update or so from the industry and that's all held confidential but they give us the numbers, aggregate numbers in the revenue source book every fall, late fall in December and then they normally update the price but on rare occasions they'll even update capital costs in the spring revenue forecast. Yet we're being told here at the table it may cost 45 billion or it may cost 90 billion. It's not an acceptable answer, just not an acceptable answer.
Alaska Senate Finance Committee reviews fiscal analysis of proposed tax structure for Alaska LNG project, showing $18 billion combined revenue reduction over project life in exchange for improved global price competitiveness.
