Adam Prestidge
21:20 - 22:12
"we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase."
“we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 21:20 – 22:12
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 26, 2026
From the transcript
It is beyond any practical sense that Glenfarm would be seeking this tax arrangement with any type of a view to evaluation in terms of if hypothetical after hypothetical occurred and the whole project fell apart. That's not— that hasn't even entered into our thinking. That said, I understand the sensitivity around it, and we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase. So Glenfarm's position is that you would not claim credit for any value added through tax abatement or other relief from the legislature? Representative Sharkey, essentially yes.
Related Coverage
Alaska's gas-line tax bill stalls in committee
A conference committee deadlocked on Alaska's LNG tax bill, rejecting both House and Senate versions, and will seek expanded power to write a compromise on HB 381.
by Walter AlaskaNews1mo ago2 min readAI
A leaked plan to fire Alaska's gas-line developer surfaces in Juneau
A confidential AGDC document describing how Alaska could remove Glenfarne as Alaska LNG's lead developer leaked, surfacing publicly at Friday's HB 381 hearing.
by Walter AlaskaNews1mo ago3 min readAI