0:51
Adam Prestidge
21:20 - 22:12
"we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase."
“we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 21:20 – 22:12
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 26, 2026
From the transcript
It is beyond any practical sense that Glenfarm would be seeking this tax arrangement with any type of a view to evaluation in terms of if hypothetical after hypothetical occurred and the whole project fell apart. That's not— that hasn't even entered into our thinking. That said, I understand the sensitivity around it, and we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase. So Glenfarm's position is that you would not claim credit for any value added through tax abatement or other relief from the legislature? Representative Sharkey, essentially yes.
Related Coverage
Alaska LNG conference committee deadlocks, seeks free conference powers
The HB 381 conference committee failed Friday to adopt either the House or Senate version of the Alaska LNG tax bill, with each body's delegation voting against the other's version. Chair Calvin Schrage announced the committee will proceed under limited powers of free conference to write a compromise from scratch, with a follow-up meeting set for Saturday morning.
by Walter AlaskaNews2h ago3 min readAIAlaska
