Adam Prestidge
21:20 - 22:12
“we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase.”
- Speaker
- Adam Prestidge
- Timestamp
- 21:20 – 22:12
- Transcript
- Alaska Legislature: JHB381-260626-1400
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
From the transcript
It is beyond any practical sense that Glenfarm would be seeking this tax arrangement with any type of a view to evaluation in terms of if hypothetical after hypothetical occurred and the whole project fell apart. That's not— that hasn't even entered into our thinking. That said, I understand the sensitivity around it, and we do have the view that if there were ever a cash consideration or a cash repurchase, we would not ask for the monetary value of any tax arrangement to be reflected in terms of in any repurchase. So Glenfarm's position is that you would not claim credit for any value added through tax abatement or other relief from the legislature? Representative Sharkey, essentially yes.
Related Coverage
Alaska's gas-line tax bill stalls in committee
Lawmakers writing Alaska's gas-line tax deal voted down both versions of the bill — now they need special authority to build a compromise from the pieces.
A leaked plan to fire Alaska's gas-line developer surfaces in Juneau
A "stolen" state document laying out how Alaska could fire Glenfarne from its $44B gas line leaked — and the developer says it's now wondering whether Alaska can keep a secret.
