0:54
Dan Stickel
42:57 - 43:51
"our official spring revenue forecast conservatively does not include any revenue from the AK LNG project or related development. And so what we do here is we show If the project were to proceed without tax modifications under our baseline set of assumptions around the project, which include a $46.2 billion real 2026 capital cost"
“our official spring revenue forecast conservatively does not include any revenue from the AK LNG project or related development. And so what we do here is we show If the project were to proceed without tax modifications under our baseline set of assumptions around the project, which include a $46.2 billion real 2026 capital cost”
- Speaker
- Dan Stickel
- Timestamp
- 42:57 – 43:51
- Source
- SFIN-260529-0900
- Community
- Alaska News
- Captured at
- May 29, 2026
From the transcript
Please proceed, Mr. Stickle. All right, slide 18 continues with the property tax changes, looking in terms of our fiscal estimates. So our official spring revenue forecast conservatively does not include any revenue from the AK LNG project or related development. And so what we do here is we show If the project were to proceed without tax modifications under our baseline set of assumptions around the project, which include a $46.2 billion real 2026 capital cost and first gas in 2029 for in-state, first exports in 2031, full project capacity of 3.5 billion cubic feet per day of exports in 2033. So those are kind of the baseline assumptions.
Related Coverage
Senate Finance Committee: how do you analyze a $46.2 billion pipeline without the numbers?
Alaska Senate Finance Committee demands actual commercial and financial data for proposed $46.2 billion gas pipeline before considering state investment role
by Bill AlaskaNews23h ago3 min readJuneau, AlaskaAI
