
Frank Richards
28:59 - 29:55
"The document that we are discussing today is a draft document that AGDC staff created specifically to provide information to AGDC's board while we were working on the definitive agreement."
“The document that we are discussing today is a draft document that AGDC staff created specifically to provide information to AGDC's board while we were working on the definitive agreement.”
- Speaker
- Frank Richards
- Timestamp
- 28:59 – 29:55
- Community
- Alaska News
- Location
- Alaska
- Captured at
- June 26, 2026
From the transcript
And then it also Perhaps to Glen Farn would be interesting for the listening audience to know if the competitive disadvantage that might have ensued from all of this, if that sort of has played itself out or is that a real ongoing sort of concern? Through the Chair, through to Speaker Edgeman, again, Frank Richards for the record. The document that we are discussing today is a draft document that AGDC staff created specifically to provide information to AGDC's board while we were working on the definitive agreement. It contains a summary description of the documents that we were negotiating with Glenfarm at the time, specifically naming them. But it also includes information around the selection of Glenfarm as the the lead developer as compared to other parties.
Related Coverage
Alaska's gas-line tax bill stalls in committee
A conference committee deadlocked on Alaska's LNG tax bill, rejecting both House and Senate versions, and will seek expanded power to write a compromise on HB 381.

A leaked plan to fire Alaska's gas-line developer surfaces in Juneau
A confidential AGDC document describing how Alaska could remove Glenfarne as Alaska LNG's lead developer leaked, surfacing publicly at Friday's HB 381 hearing.
