Skip to main content
1:10

Nicholas Fulford

30:09 - 31:20

“the optionality that would follow from S corp status and, and not having an obligation to pay corporate income tax in Alaska. Obviously that provides value to a potential investor”
Community
Alaska News
Location
Alaska
Captured at
May 27, 2026

From the transcript

Obviously, tax treatment for S corps is quite complex in the sense that notionally at least, tax is payable at a federal level on dividends. Now, the optionality that would follow from S corp status and, and not having an obligation to pay corporate income tax in Alaska. Obviously that provides value to a potential investor, and it's one of the things which, um, I imagine the legislature will look at fairly carefully in terms of the investors in the LNG project, given the tax rate, tax amounts potentially collectible. Senator Steadman, just for those watching at home, you know, when we're looking at this, we— if the gas is sold at the wellhead or at the edge of the field, they're going to pay the upstream producers. The oil companies are going to pay the corporate income tax, royalties, severance tax, and Oh, the fourth one.

Related Coverage

Alaska LNG faces tax competition from Canadian projects with federal support

Canada landed its big LNG project the old-fashioned way, by quietly stacking tax breaks for investors years before anyone broke ground, and Alaska's Senate spent Wednesday flipping through the recipe to see what's worth copying.

Cover image for article: Alaska LNG faces tax competition from Canadian projects with federal support