
Brock Wilson
39:00 - 39:57
"when we look at the reduction in force, the probationary termination, and the buyouts collectively, at a national scale, by far the buyouts are what have caused the largest decline in the federal workforce. That is, we're talking about at a national level here— in one month, approximately almost 75,000 to 80,000 workers suddenly leaving"
“when we look at the reduction in force, the probationary termination, and the buyouts collectively, at a national scale, by far the buyouts are what have caused the largest decline in the federal workforce. That is, we're talking about at a national level here— in one month, approximately almost 75,000 to 80,000 workers suddenly leaving”
But when we look at the reduction in force, the probationary termination, and the buyouts collectively, at a national scale, by far the buyouts are what have caused the largest decline in the federal workforce. That is, we're talking about at a national level here— oops, gotta move that over— in one month, approximately almost 75,000 to 80,000 workers suddenly leaving in a second wave, approximately. And I should have to caveat, that's probably closer to 40,000, 50,000, and then a second wave there. And so these, these terminations, they're very real and they affected a set of people by a much larger ratio. The reduction is coming from these people who took out these, the, the DRP or the Deferred Resignation Program.
UAA economists say federal spending drove about half of Alaska's growth since 2015 — and the state is now losing federal workers faster than most, hitting rural areas hardest.
