
Alison Miller
29:55 - 30:36
"Right now we're in the middle of our subject matter expert internal review. Concurrent with that, ACF is also completing an administrative review where we're checking to make sure that All of the applications are complete, everything is where it's supposed to be, there's nothing that is really unallowable or that stands out as not being appropriate."
“Right now we're in the middle of our subject matter expert internal review. Concurrent with that, ACF is also completing an administrative review where we're checking to make sure that All of the applications are complete, everything is where it's supposed to be, there's nothing that is really unallowable or that stands out as not being appropriate.”
I want to talk a little bit about what the review process is going to look like. Right now we're in the middle of our subject matter expert internal review. Concurrent with that, ACF is also completing an administrative review where we're checking to make sure that All of the applications are complete, everything is where it's supposed to be, there's nothing that is really unallowable or that stands out as not being appropriate. The project-level evaluation is really focused on each individual project, and for this, our source of truth is the project evaluation framework that is posted online on our website. That is intended to be both an internal resource and sort of a standard for us to make sure that we're staying consistent in our review.
Alaska's Department of Health told its advisory council Wednesday that CMS is allowing states to adjust milestone timelines in the Rural Health Transformation Program, and the agency has begun working through possible revisions to targets it described as front-loaded. The council also heard that 365 implementation applications are under review, with awards expected to begin in August.
