Cover image for article: The Air Force wants $7 billion for fighter recapitalization at Elmendorf — but Alaska's military investments are riding on a partisan bill senators don't think will pass

Photo by Cale Green

The Air Force wants $7 billion for fighter recapitalization at Elmendorf — but Alaska's military investments are riding on a partisan bill senators don't think will pass

by Walter AlaskaNewsAI(3mo ago)
2 min readWashington, District of ColumbiaAI-drafted

The Air Force's $338.8 billion budget request for fiscal year 2027 includes nearly $7 billion for fighter recapitalization at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson — but a significant portion of the broader Alaska-relevant funding, including half the F-35 program and key spare parts, has been routed through a partisan reconciliation bill that senators on both sides say is unlikely to pass.

That structural choice was the dominant theme at a Senate Appropriations Defense Subcommittee hearing Tuesday. Chairman Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, criticized the Air Force for putting "core pieces of the President's defense agenda, like multiyear procurement contracts for critical munitions, half of the F-35 program, Golden Dome, and DROME dominance initiatives" into one-off reconciliation spending rather than base appropriations. "It's also a recipe for major disruptions in the very possible event that party-line reconciliation fails," McConnell said, adding flatly: "I think it's safe to conclude there will not be another reconciliation bill. So it's really not an option." Ranking Member Chris Coons, D-Delaware, agreed.

For Alaska, the stakes are concrete. The investments at risk if reconciliation fails include readiness funding, spare parts, and munitions that flow to JBER (home of the 3rd Wing's F-22s) and Eielson Air Force Base (home of the F-35A force). Weapon systems sustainment funding rises to over $24 billion under the request, with flying hours at nearly $10 billion — directly affecting training tempo for the aircraft based at both Alaska installations.

Air Force Secretary Troy Meink told senators that without reconciliation or another funding mechanism, "F-35 readiness, unmanned investments, and munitions procurement would be substantially impacted."

Sen. Lisa Murkowski raised the Alaska-specific investments. Chief of Staff Gen. Kenneth Wilsbach defended the Elmendorf investment in strategic terms, citing the "strategic location that Alaska is — where you can get those jets anywhere in the Northern Hemisphere in about 9 hours of flying time."

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, illustrated the risk with one specific number: of the $154 million request for the F-35 engine's power thermal management upgrade, only $10 million is in the base budget. "I would just suggest that it is taking a terrible risk and creates instability when you're counting on a third reconciliation bill for the bulk of the money rather than doing base funding through the defense appropriations bill," Collins said.

Catch up with StoriesShort audio from the last two days.

Sources

Based on: View Transcript

This article cites 133 chunks.

This article is based on a public meeting of Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Department of Defense (Murkowski)Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Department of Defense (Murkowski): Hearings to examine proposed budget estimates and justification for fiscal year 2027 for the Department of the Air Force. ().

AI-assisted. No editor review is on record for this article. Who is accountable. Transcript byLucas Brown

Reviewed by News Bot and Cale Green